External security assessments for AI-built apps
Fast to buildisn't the same assafe to ship.
Independent, human-verified security testing for the apps you shipped fast with AI coding tools. We find the real, exploitable issues — broken access control, authentication, business logic, exposed data — verify every one by hand, and hand you a clear report with the fixes.
Security Snapshot £149 · full assessments from £500 · report in days
Attackers have AI too.
The same tools that let you ship in a weekend let someone probe your app in minutes. Uncensored, jailbroken models are already being pointed at real sites to find the easy, common holes — broken access control, exposed endpoints, injectable inputs — at machine speed and almost no cost. The barrier to finding your weak spots has collapsed.
So we run that same kind of adversarial testing at your app first. A multi-model workflow hunts the exact holes those models find, and a person reproduces and verifies every one by hand — then hands you the fix.
WE FIND THEM FIRST · NOT A FIREWALLThis isn’t a shield and it doesn’t sit in front of your app. It’s an assessment: we find what an attacker’s AI would find, so you can close it before someone malicious does.
You built it fast. Real users are on it now.
AI coding tools ship features in hours; security review has not kept up — and the assistant that wrote your app cannot independently check its own work. Study after study finds the same thing: a large share of AI-generated code ships with real, exploitable flaws.
AI writes fast — and leaves gaps
Roughly half of AI-generated code samples introduce a known OWASP Top 10 weakness (Veracode, 2025). The speed that ships your product ships the mistakes along with it.
Broken access control is the #1 risk
The most common flaw in AI-built apps is a polished, role-aware interface with little or no enforcement on the server. Change an ID or a request and you can often reach data or actions that are not yours.
Your AI cannot grade its own homework
Asking the same assistant that built the app whether it is secure is not an independent check. You need an outside, adversarial look — with a human standing behind every finding.
What AI-built apps tend to get wrong.
Simplified examples of well-documented weakness classes. Never client code, never client findings.
Changing an ID shows someone else’s data
IDOR · CWE-639 · OWASP A01A profile update that also accepts a role
Mass assignment · CWE-915 · OWASP API3:2023Paid features unlocked by the browser
Payment bypass · CWE-807 · OWASP A04An admin key shipped to every visitor
Exposed secret · CWE-200Changing an ID shows someone else’s data
The interface only shows your own records, but the server returns any record whose ID you ask for.
IDOR · CWE-639 · OWASP A01A profile update that also accepts a role
The whole request body is written to the database, so an extra field like role: "admin" goes straight through.
Mass assignment · CWE-915 · OWASP API3:2023Paid features unlocked by the browser
The app trusts what the client says about the plan instead of checking the payment provider on the server.
Payment bypass · CWE-807 · OWASP A04An admin key shipped to every visitor
A key that bypasses your database rules is given a public prefix, so it ends up in the JavaScript every browser downloads.
Exposed secret · CWE-200Every finding in your report is classified the same way, against OWASP and CWE. Read the sample report
A real assessment. Not a scanner dump.
Every engagement runs through a structured, multi-model testing workflow and is then verified by a person. You get findings you can act on — reproduced, prioritised and explained — not a wall of unconfirmed scanner noise.
Human-verified findings
Every issue is reproduced by hand against your running app, with a control case, before it reaches your report. If it does not reproduce, it does not ship — so you get real problems, not a pile of false positives.
Fixes your AI can apply
Findings come prompt-ready — exact location, impact and a concrete fix — so you can hand them straight to Cursor, Claude Code or Codex and close them fast. The speed that built the app now fixes it.
A report you can act on
A plain-English executive summary for you, and a precise technical section for whoever does the fixing — severity, evidence, reproduction steps and remediation, mapped to OWASP and CWE.
Retest included
Fix the issues and we re-check them — free, within 30 days. You leave with problems verified closed, not just listed on a page.
Proof you can share
An attestation letter you can forward to your customers, investors or SOC 2 auditors — evidence the assessment happened and the issues were fixed, without exposing the sensitive detail.
Standards-aligned and honest
Testing follows the OWASP Web Security Testing Guide and is classified against the OWASP Top 10 and API Security Top 10. We are clear about scope and limits — and never claim your app is ‘100% secure.’
What we test.
Security headers, misconfiguration, file handling and more — scoped to your app.
From scoping to fixed, in a few clear steps.
Tell us about your app
Pick an assessment and fill out a short, plain-English scoping form — your URL, the user roles, what it handles. No jargon, and no call required.
Confirm & authorise
We verify you control the target, and you sign a clear authorisation that sets exactly what we may test. Once approved, you pay — no surprises, no scope creep.
We test — and verify
Your app goes through our multi-model, multi-agent workflow from an attacker's point of view. A person then verifies and prioritises every finding before it reaches you.
Report, fix, retest
You get a clear report with the fixes. Close the issues, request your included retest, and we confirm they are actually resolved.
The speed that built it now fixes it.
Every finding comes with the exact location, the impact and a concrete fix, so you can hand it straight to your coding assistant and close it fast.
Fixed price. Priced by your app.
Pick by the shape of your app — every assessment is human-verified, includes a retest and an attestation letter you can share. Prices are one-off and exclude VAT.
Security Snapshot
£149For side projects and first launches on a tight budget: a quick, human-checked look at your app before real users find the gaps.
- Automated outside-in checks: headers, exposed files and secrets, keys in your front-end code
- Hand-checked test: can one user reach another user’s data?
- Only verified findings, each with a prompt-ready fix
- Full £149 credited if you upgrade to Launch or Standard within 30 days
Not an assessment: no business-logic or payment testing, no retest, no attestation letter.
$ Start a SnapshotA small site or app — a login or two, no payments or multiple tenants yet.
- OWASP Top 10 + access control, incl. CSRF
- Every finding verified by hand
- Prompt-ready fixes for your AI coding tools
- Clear report + attestation letter
- One retest within 30 days
A typical SaaS — accounts, several roles, a payment or subscription flow, an API.
- Broad OWASP WSTG coverage, incl. CSRF
- Business logic + multi-tenant isolation
- Payment / subscription bypass checks
- API security (OWASP API Top 10)
- AI feature testing (OWASP LLM Top 10)
- Optional read-only code access
- Prompt-ready fixes + attestation letter
- Three retests within 60 days
Multi-tenant, admin panels, complex logic, OAuth/SSO, several integrations.
- Everything in Standard — run deeper and longer
- Cross-component exploit chains
- Cloud, infrastructure and supply-chain review
- Threat-model and insecure-design review
- In-depth code-assisted review
- Priority scheduling
- Prompt-ready fixes + attestation letter
- Ten retests within 90 days
Multiple apps, a larger website, a mobile app, or an unusual setup.
- Fixed quote from a short scoping form
- No obligation, no sales call required
- Same human-verified standard
Not sure which fits? Start the scoping form — we confirm the right tier (or a fixed quote) before you pay anything. Compare every tier
Find out what you missed — before someone else does.
An independent, human-verified security assessment, priced for startups. You get a clear report and the fixes — usually within days, not weeks.
Elitor is an independent security practice — not a CREST/CHECK-accredited penetration-testing firm. Our assessments help you find and fix real issues affordably; they are not a substitute for an accredited pentest where one is required for regulatory, insurance or procurement compliance. If that is what you need, we will tell you.